Home Movies of Old

In the summer of 1960, my father won a contest based on sales commissions he earned while working at Dorn’s Department Store in Van Nuys.  His reward was a complete package of Kodak Brownie products:  a Hawkeye still camera with flash, an 8mm movie camera, an 8mm movie projector (model A15), and a projector screen.

Considering how erratic my dad’s employment was during his lifetime, this prize, especially the movie camera, was the best thing he ever got from any job he held, a godsend, enabling my father to chronicle our family life for the next dozen years.   While no film footage exists of my parents’ first 12 years of marriage or the early years of my brother or sister, as the youngest, I can still watch myself at age 2 splashing in a kiddie pool (my sister was 8, my brother 11).

These silent films, each roll 2 and 1/2 minutes long, are a precious archive documenting a typical American family in the 1960’s.  A stranger looking at these home movies would never suspect that lurking behind the smiles and hugs, financial ruin would soon obliterate the bank account of my parents, yet would not destroy the family.  One cannot detect any visual evidence that would reveal when we lost our cars and our house.  My dad still captured birthdays, graduations and random moments in the backyard.  We all still smiled and waved at the camera.  And really nothing was phony about it.  It is a true representation of the family structure my parents built.

They were fully committed that no matter what was happening with their finances, that we three kids would live a steady and stable life.  We didn’t go hungry, we didn’t become homeless.  We still celebrated birthdays with cake and gifts, still watched TV shows together in the living room and still had presents underneath the Christmas tree.

Every time my father held the movie camera to his eyes, I was transfixed.  I loved the look of it, a roundish rectangle of gray and black plastic that fit snugly into the palm of one’s hand.  It made this lullaby-like whirring that required rewinding via a built-in crank on the side of its body which you pulled out and wound clockwise.

I admired how important it made my father appear as he brought the camera to his face, one eye looking through the viewfinder, the other closed.  He was no longer Dad but Alfred Hitchcock. His deftness in loading and unloading the film, how easily he cranked the motor, then pressing the button that ignited the whirring of the camera—what magic!

Once in a while after pestering my father, yanking on his pant leg, to give me a chance to be the magician, he reluctantly would hand over the camera to me for a brief shot.  He was protective of those 150 seconds and did not want me wasting precious celluloid.  The stuff I shot featured unsteady panning that made the scene too dizzy to watch.  Dad had good judgment.

Of all the dozens of reels of home movies, there are a bunch of them shot in 1964 when my brother made mini-movies using his stable of Crosby actors including our dog, Champ.  Dad had no fear of his 15-year-old son operating the camera.

These flicks including colorful titles:  “Time Waits for No Villain” had an old-fashioned damsel in distress plotline, “Ghoul from the Black Pool” was a monster movie with a dramatic death scene in our swimming pool and “Gidget Meets Spade Coolie” featured me as a sick child whose doctor hurts not heals, turning me into a dog (a comedy).

My dad would drop off the exposed film at Albin’s, the local corner drugstore, where it would take a few days to be developed.

This type of delayed satisfaction is something people under 50 would not understand having been spoiled with the instant gratification of shooting photos and video on one’s cell phone and immediately viewing it.

When it came time for Dad to pick up the film, excitement would build waiting for the sun to go down so it would be dark enough to show the latest Crosby production starring us.  It was thrilling to see our images projected on the screen, literally larger than life.  We felt like movie stars.

The family would gather in the living room as Dad set up everything.  First, he’d put up the screen, extending the tripod legs down onto the floor, then lifting up the shush of the screen upward onto the small plastic ledge to keep the screen safely extended.  The screen’s silver sheen created anticipation as my dad took the projector out of its yellow cardboard box, placing it on a TV tray.  He would carefully thread the white leader that said KODAK multiple times and someone had the job of turning off the lights.  No film premiered without all five Crosbys in attendance.

The images on the film could be of a day at Disneyland or a day in the backyard.  It didn’t matter.  What mattered was this was an activity that bonded the family.  Often Dad would provide repeated viewings, then take special requests to show older home movies stored in shoeboxes in the hall closet.

Not until I got older did I realize how ingenious my father was in self-editing whatever event he was documenting.  He knew he only had 2 and ½ minutes of footage per roll, so he had to economize what to shoot and what not to shoot, figuring out how long for each shot so that by the time he took the roll of film into the drugstore to be developed, the mini-movie was already edited.  Another concept that would be hard to grasp for those under 50 who are accustomed to taking dozens of photos of one image and hours of video without regard to quality.

In the old days, limiting customers to a few minutes of movie time and 24 exposures for print rolls forced people to be selective.  Ever since I switched over from film to digital, the vast majority of images rarely get seen.  Unlike the older photo technology which was easier to share via photo albums, slides or movies, today’s huge inventory of material stored in the cloud requires someone to sift through it all and edit it down to a manageable viewing running time, an overwhelming task. 

All the Kodak Brownie equipment, including the 70-some rolls of film, remain with me, in their original yellow packaging.

The final time we used the Kodak Brownie movie camera was in 1973, six months after my father passed away. The four of us took a driving trip along Highway One. It was the last vacation we took. Dad would have loved the trip and he would have been happy to see that my cinematography had improved.

Hearing Dad’s Voice–After 50 Years

“Good morning my three lovely children.

I trust you all slept well?

There is plenty of food to eat so eat well.

Greg, you eat well, but according to your diet.

And please, no fights!

[said with a sigh] Now, I guess I’ll put some gas in that Plymouth.

So listen:  I’ll leave the key in the sewing machine.

Greg, if you’ll drive Debbie to the car, she can drive it home.

I guess I’ll have to go to Hemet today, but I’ll try to be home before six, as Mom wants to go to the May Company.

I love you all very, very much so please take care of one another.

Dad.”

This was an audio recorded message my Dad left behind one morning in June of 1970.

109 words.

It’s only 43 seconds long.

That is all us three kids have of our father’s voice.

A voice we haven’t heard for nearly 50 years.  That is when our father died on Jan. 27, 1973 from lung cancer one month after reaching 60 years of life.

Dad often left handwritten notes behind on the dining room table whenever he left the house and all three of us were still asleep, our mother already gone to her 7:00 a.m. hospital job.  His fatherly instinct to reassure his children that nothing has happened to him illustrates the type of loving dad he was.

I vividly recalled that Dad had left behind a vocal “note” to us kids one time.  That morning, he must have been in a rush and decided recording a message would have saved time.

That recorded message of Dad’s was the impetus to get the old Columbia reel-to-reel tape machine repaired.

The 60-year-old tape recorder has been in my family since I was a small child.  After my brother and sister moved away, it has always traveled with me, the youngest child, as I have moved.  The last time the machine worked was 30 years ago.

When I went through cleaning my garage last summer, I was looking forward to plugging the old machine in to hear all 36 reels of tape again, each lasting an hour.  I especially was interested in finding the few snatches of my Dad’s voice.

The tape recorder with the capacity for 7-inch reels has a twin auxiliary speaker with the same dimensions as the main machine: 16”x15”, 10” high.

The big difference between the two black boxes was the weight.  I need to use both hands to pick up the main machine which weighs 35 pounds.  The surface has a tacky feel to it, and the smell of the machine is one of childhood.  A persistent hum like a heartbeat can be heard when turning it on.

So when I brought it out from the bottom compartment of a worn stereo cabinet that’s against the back wall of my garage, I set it up on the backyard patio where I have an electric outlet to plug it in.

To my major disappointment, the machine did not turn on.  I looked at the thick gray power cord and noticed how the outside rubber had worn away.  The machine had always worked reliably before, but time had finally taken its toll.

Imagine trying to find a store that would fix a reel-to-reel machine from the early1960’s.  I might as well be looking for a blacksmith.

The internet did not provide me with much help.  I could not find an image of my machine let alone any information that the Columbia company, famously known for recording music, ever manufactured their own machines.

Maybe I could find a place to rent a reel-to-reel machine especially in a media market such as Los Angeles?

Well, I did locate one place in North Hollywood which rents them out.  However, when I saw the machine, it was a professional grade rather than a home consumer version, too complicated for a non-sound engineer like me to operate.

Surely, there would be a library which had reel-to-reel equipment for visitors to play audio recordings.

The Los Angeles Central Library in downtown does have such a room, but due to the pandemic, it has remained closed for two years.

Finally, at my local camera store (another relic from the past), the owner located a man who would repair the machine at the princely sum of $600.

What could I do?  It was my only option to ever hear these tapes again, the only option to ever hear my father’s voice again.

Most people alive today have a hard time grasping that once upon a time there weren’t any recording devices except for audio tape.

Home video didn’t become common until the 1970’s; digital formats arrived in the late 1980’s.

So having a home audio recording device was a major deal.  That is why so much of what us kids recorded 60 years ago sounds silly to hear today, inconsequential nonsense just because we had the ability to place a microphone in front of a TV speaker to record a whole movie that we could at least hear again.

In the 1960’s, if there was any movie or TV show you wanted to view again, you had to wait until it reappeared either on the big screen or the boob tube.

Other recordings were of us three kids pretending to be a DJ on the radio.  We would introduce current songs playing on Top 40 radio stations and introduce them.  The only worthwhile thing from these tapes is that it provides a time stamp when they were made.  I was able to look up a song and find its released date.  After all, oldies radio stations did not exist back then so all the popular music being played was new.

When 8-millimeter home movies became popular in the 1950’s and 1960’s, people could permanently record their loved ones on film, though without sound.

However, not until consumers had video camcorders in the late 70’s was it possible to record both sound and picture.

And that is what makes those 43 seconds of audio tape of my Dad so precious.  Yes, we do have home movies in which he appears, but they are silent.  And he is the one family member who was the least filmed of all five of us because he was the primary cameraman.

Once I picked up the repaired machine, I anxiously started playing each reel.  Unfortunately, most of the tapes have incorrect labeling requiring me to listen to each 30-minute side.

Since so much of the taped material is not worth archiving, I quickly tired of listening to every bit and began fast-forwarding a few minutes at a time so that I didn’t go past any important recording.

On the third day I hit pay dirt.   I was fast forwarding a tape, then stopped it.  When I pressed “play” again, I heard my Dad talking to me—for the first time in half of a century.  It was chilling and thrilling.

There was his gravelly fatherly voice, full of emotion, recorded with the microphone quite close to his mouth giving it an intimacy and aliveness.

His voice sounded older than the late 50’s chronological age that he was.  The cancer may have already begun growing inside of him.  But nothing could diminish the love that he always had for his children.

Immediately I had both my brother and sister on two separate phones and told them, “Listen to this,” then played Dad’s recording.

It was a special moment for all three of us.  There was Dad alive again speaking directly to us.

It was as if he was talking to us from beyond especially the last part where he firmly reminds us to “please take care of one another,” emphasizing “please.”  He didn’t like it whenever us kids fought one another; he loved us too much to have to come home with reports about our behavior that day.

He would have been pleased how close all three of us have remained in the decades since his death.  Perhaps the void he left tightened the bond.

My sister pointed out that it wasn’t just a coincidence that as I was scanning this audio tapes, I happened to stop at one point in fast-forwarding, pressed play, and there was our father’s message to us from a half of a century ago.

Dad wanted to talk to us one more time.

The Columbia High Fidelity reel-to-reel tape recorder circa 1962.