It used to be that going to school on time every day was a given. Only truly sick children missed school.
Six million children missed at least three weeks of school in the 2013-14 school year, according to the U.S Department of Education’s Civil Rights Data Collection report. That equates to 13 percent of all students.
Think of a business that could operate effectively without 13 percent of its workforce.
The bad habits students practice in kindergarten through 12th grade cannot simply be altered like a light switch once they enter the job market.
Name one job where people get paid for not being there.
“Even the best teachers can’t be successful with students who aren’t in class,” Education Secretary John B. King Jr. told reporters last June.
California has a Compulsory Education Law stipulating that “every child from the age of 6 to 18 be in school—on time, every day.”
A student’s education suffers when he is not in school. Period.
There is a direct correlation between missing school and falling behind academically. According to the California Department of Education, “first grade students with 9 or more total absences are twice as likely to drop out of high school than their peers who attend school regularly.”
Last December, President Obama signed into law a revision of the No Child Left Behind act that requires for the first time that states report individual absences for all students.
It’s not just the learning that suffers when a student isn’t in a classroom. Money is lost as well.
Schools derive much of their funding based on Average Daily Attendance or ADA. In Glendale the ADA is $55 per student per day. With an enrollment around 26,000, that adds up to $1.43 million if all students are present.
If 10 percent of students are absent for one day the entire year, that results in a loss of $143,000. Multiply that by 180 school days and you have $25.7 million. Quite a sum of money that could go towards hiring more teachers and funding more programs.
Last semester, I tracked the number of students present over a 78-day period and here are the results:
In my first period class, 25 percent of the time I had full attendance, second period had seven percent, third period had 17 percent, fifth period had 20 percent, and sixth period had 12 percent.
Looking at the numbers in a different way, 88 percent of the time I had at least one student absent in my Per. 6 class. This makes it quite difficult for a teacher to maintain consistency in lesson planning as well as cooperative learning groups.
I had 25 students who had double-digit absences including one who had 24 (that’s a loss of 5 weeks of instruction in a 17-week period), plus five students with double-digit tardies (the highest 16).
When I returned to work last week, teachers were asked to do more to encourage students to get to class on time in order to decrease the number of tardies. However, the bulk of the tardies come at the start of school; in other words, due to kids arriving late.
Unless teachers don Uber hats and pick up kids from their homes, the responsibility of getting children to school rests on the shoulders of parents. Parents need to model to their children good work habits and work habit number one is getting to school every day and on time.